Transcribe Hornaday, W. T. Letter to Ward, Henry A. (1882-01-27)
« previous page | next page » |
Current Page Transcription [edit] [view item]
ybg [ upside down at top of page - Mr Howell saw the criticized Bulletin you sent me.. He announced a price of subscription in the late no. </u I > think that was absolutely necessary for us to do that for the sake of </u appearances > and our dignity as a journal. Don't You ? ]
Rochester, N. Y.
Jan 27th 1882 Feb 28
My dear Prof. Ward: -
Your welcome letter from Yokohama
arrived in due time and was read with great interest. You will ere this meets you have found a letter from me in the hands of Mr Clements. I hear that Baker & Lucas have written you quite volubly of late and I presume I cannot tell you anything fresh except what concerns myself alone.
First about the last </u Bulletin. > Inasmuch as it was gotten
out without reference to me or my ideas. I wish to distinctly distain </u all > responsibility in the matter, of any kind what - soever. I was given the proof of my own contributions to read and correct, but </u no more >. I </u saw > other proof sheets but was not called upon to correct them and did not feel like intruding my services. My most important articles were all suppressed and I had no voice in the make-up of the paper in any way. I wish you to see clearly that </s I > the </u Bulletin > has been taken completely and bodily out of my hands. You sent your articles to Mr Lucas and I did not even see them until they were printed, nor know anything about your wishes regarding them. I understand that the Megapod article was not sent to the </u Naturalist. > .Had you sent your articles to me I think you would have found that I am still able to obey orders. Where I saw the articles in print I saw that the Megapodius had been written with much more care than the one on Hatteria, and your last letter explains how it happened so, which I did not know before. When the </u Bulletin > came out I went through a copy of it carefully and marked the changes & corrections I would have made had </u I > been editorially re- sponsible for it., and that copy I sent to you, care of Mr Clements. If Mr Howell had given me the opportunity in accordance with your wishes plainly stated to him in my